Maailma tankide tabel üks, kaks & kolm.
Abrams M1A1/2

Al Khalid

Amx-30

Ariete-1C

Arjun

Black Eagle

Challenger-2

Centurion

Chieftain

Hiina tankid

Leclerc

Leopard-1

Leopard-2

K1A1

Magach

Merkava

M60A3

M-48

Of-40

Olifant

Sabra

Stridsvagn 103

T-54/55

T-62

T-64

T-72

T-80

T-90

T-94/95

Type-82 PT-85

Type-90

Teised tankid

Tulevik

Vanad tankid

Tundmatu

Javelin

Maailma tankid

Tankitõrje

Tšetšeenia kogemus

Vene tankipark

Guestbook

Bomb blast under tank kills four soldiers in Gaza attack

Four Israel Defense Forces soldiers were killed yesterday morning when their tank drove over a 100-kilo explosive device in the northern Gaza Strip.

Hamas's military wing, Iz a Din al-Kassam, claimed responsibility for the attack, saying it had been a response to the deaths of two Hamas activists killed near Beit Lahia in a clash with IDF troops earlier this month.

The incident occured at 8:21 A.M., about one kilometer southeast of the Dugit settlement, and some 300 meters south of the perimeter fence marking the edge of the area under permanent Israeli control.

As part of the lessons learned in the wake of three previous incidents in the Strip in which three Merkava tanks were attacked, resulting in the death of seven soldiers, yesterday's operation was being carried out with two vehicles - an armored bulldozer, followed, at a distance of some 50 meters, by the tank. It appears that the bulldozer passed over the same spot, but failed to detonate the explosive device. A few seconds later, the tank set off the bomb.

Word of the casualties was held back for hours until the families of the soldiers could be notified.

At a press conference yesterday evening, GOC Central Command Major General Doron Almog said the tank, a Magach 7, had been traveling south in the area when "it ran over an explosive device weighing about 100 kilograms." He said the blast had caused the ammunition inside the tank to explode, killing the vehicle's entire crew.

"We know that Hamas is behind the incident," Almog said. "We know that Hamas planted the bomb in the area, and we also know who from Hamas was involved in this operation.

Military sources said that the IDF was expected to mount a response in the Strip. In addition to targeting those directly responsible, the sources said, the IDF was expected to take widespread action against the terror organizations in general.

IDF tank activity south of the perimeter fence has been increased recently in an effort, inter alia, to disrupt the firing of Qassam rockets from the nearby Beit Hanoun area.

The blast yesterday led to a series of explosions inside the tank, apparently killing the vehicle's crew immediately. The subsequent blaze kept rescue forces at bay for a relatively long time.

The initial IDF inquiry shows that the device weighed some 100 kilograms (the Hamas statement put the bomb at 25 kilograms only) and was comprised of military-grade explosives, perhaps mixed with improvised materials. The device was detonated by means of a pressure fuse and not from afar.

The tank was not fitted with a protective plate on its underbelly, which would not have helped against a device of that size, military sources said.

At his press conference, Almog said that the device may have been laid in the area some time ago. Based on the initial inquiry, he added, the force had operated properly, and the tank had been moving along the path cleared by the bulldozer.

Military sources said, however, that the inquiry had raised questions regarding the planning of the operation, noting that the IDF had not operated in the area for several weeks. High-ranking officers said that better use of scouts and infantry forces could have prevented the disaster, adding that the entire operation should have been reconsidered in light of the muddy conditions.

It was still too early to tell why the tank and not the bulldozer had set off the explosion, Almog said at his press conference, noting that the reason may be linked to the angle at which the pressure fuse had been laid, but adding: "At this stage, it's all conjecture."


By Amos Harel and Arnon Regular